<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Agi on AI Coding Blog</title><link>https://mpklu.github.io/tags/agi/</link><description>Recent content in Agi on AI Coding Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 12:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://mpklu.github.io/tags/agi/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Lattice Hypothesis</title><link>https://mpklu.github.io/posts/lattice/</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://mpklu.github.io/posts/lattice/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;An engineer&amp;rsquo;s conjecture on distributed biological intelligence, dreams, and the uncomfortable trajectory of AI&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In computing, thick clients carry their own processing power, storage, and local decision-making — but they become dramatically more capable when networked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A thought lodged in my head recently and wouldn&amp;rsquo;t leave:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A human brain looks remarkably like a thick client.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andy Clark and David Chalmers argued in their &lt;a href="https://consc.net/papers/extended.html"&gt;&amp;ldquo;Extended Mind&amp;rdquo; thesis&lt;/a&gt; (1998) that cognition doesn&amp;rsquo;t stop at the skull — it extends into notebooks, tools, and cultural artifacts. They didn&amp;rsquo;t use the client-server vocabulary, but the implication is the same: the brain is a node in a larger system.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>