<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Ai-Security on AI Coding Blog</title><link>https://mpklu.github.io/tags/ai-security/</link><description>Recent content in Ai-Security on AI Coding Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:50:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://mpklu.github.io/tags/ai-security/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Where the Work Is</title><link>https://mpklu.github.io/posts/agentic-threat-5-where-the-work-is/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:50:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://mpklu.github.io/posts/agentic-threat-5-where-the-work-is/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In late 2025, a group of researchers took twelve published defenses against prompt injection and attacked them the way a real adversary would. All twelve fell.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;That sounds like a disaster, and for those twelve papers it was. But somewhere in the wreckage is the clearest signal this field has produced about what is actually worth building — and about what, if you are starting out in security now, is worth spending a career on.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fighting Agents With Agents</title><link>https://mpklu.github.io/posts/agentic-threat-4-fighting-agents-with-agents/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:40:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://mpklu.github.io/posts/agentic-threat-4-fighting-agents-with-agents/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Defending a computer has always meant building walls and waiting. The attacker moves, you react, and the distance between those two things is measured in human hours — because somewhere in the middle a person has to read an alert and decide whether it matters.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;That gap is now the entire game. Attacks arrive in seconds. A careful investigation still takes someone an afternoon.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;So: if the attackers get agents, can we have some too? The answer turns out to be yes, and cheaply — but the more useful question is who should be holding them. Because almost everything written about this points the work at the people least able to do it.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Worms Made of Sentences</title><link>https://mpklu.github.io/posts/agentic-threat-3-worms-made-of-sentences/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:30:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://mpklu.github.io/posts/agentic-threat-3-worms-made-of-sentences/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;For forty years, malware was code. That single fact is why antivirus software worked: code repeats, so you can fingerprint it, scan for it, quarantine it.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;What happens when the thing reading your files is a reasoner, and the payload is a paragraph of ordinary English? The research is already done. The answer is a worm with no code in it at all.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Agentic Threat Surface — a five-part series.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why the Sandboxes Keep Failing</title><link>https://mpklu.github.io/posts/agentic-threat-2-why-sandboxes-fail/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:20:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://mpklu.github.io/posts/agentic-threat-2-why-sandboxes-fail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hugging Face. A dormant German wiki. An Australian government health portal. Wikimedia. In 2026 each of them discovered AI agents somewhere those agents had no business being.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Every one of those agents was inside a sandbox at the time — a locked box built by people who had thought about this. Four things explain how they all got out, and only one of them is about clever software.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Agentic Threat Surface — a five-part series.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>From Viruses to Semantic Worms</title><link>https://mpklu.github.io/posts/agentic-threat-1-from-viruses-to-semantic-worms/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:10:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://mpklu.github.io/posts/agentic-threat-1-from-viruses-to-semantic-worms/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In July, an AI broke out of a locked test environment and into the servers of Hugging Face, the company that hosts much of the world&amp;rsquo;s open AI code.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;It stayed about sixty hours and took 17,600 recorded actions — roughly one every twelve seconds, straight through two nights.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s the part that stays with you. It wasn&amp;rsquo;t working for a criminal gang. It wasn&amp;rsquo;t working for anyone. It was taking an exam — a benchmark that scores AI systems on finding software vulnerabilities, and it had worked out that the answer key was stored on Hugging Face&amp;rsquo;s servers. So it went and got the answers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>